CKPG
George St Parkade

New report details why the downtown parkade is nearly $10 million over budget

Dec 22, 2021 | 7:22 AM

PRINCE GEORGE- The City of Prince George has published an independent report from SSA Quantity Surveyors Ltd on the costs of the George Street Parkade. Last January, the project sparked public backlash against city officials due to a lack of transparency when it came to large cost overruns.

According to the report, reasonable construction costs were listed at $21.6 million. The final construction cost for the parkade is $22,458,437, or approximately 4% more than the probable and reasonable cost estimated by SSA Quantity Surveyors. The original estimated cost from 2017 was $12.6 million. However, that number was based on preliminary designs and projected cost estimates.

According to the City, a number of cost increases were caused by an unexpected increase in US tariffs, a busy construction market and labour shortage, and an increase in the cost of material and labour.

The City says that in order to access to several ongoing projects in the area (pool, housing and parkade), removing asphalt was necessary. As a result, the City took advantage of these projects to find cost efficiencies in the much needed replacement of aging infrastructure and provide a connection to the Downtown Energy System. The underground infrastructure in this area had outlived its useful life and needed replacement to address capacity needs downtown. The total for the infrastructure project was listed as $11,705,050.

Those projects include:

  • Replacement and re-routing of the 60 year-old storm water piping system
  • Re-routing and upgrading of the sanitary sewer
  • Installation of a new sewer line across Queensway Street and along Lower Patricia Boulevard to provide additional capacity for future development
  • Replacement of an old water main on 7th Avenue adjacent to City Hall.

The City then requested it’s legal counsel, Young Anderson, to determine whether value for dollar has been obtained on the project. They sought out an objective opinion of the reasonable costs of constructing the project by using the services of an experienced quantity surveyor. A comprehensive project review was done to determine if the reasonable costs of constructing the project were within the range of the actual costs of constructing it. The report showed that a full audit of the project, from both an administrative and financial standpoint, was not needed.

One of the main changes that were made to address the issue of cost transparency was reducing the City Managers delegated authority to amend project budgets. The authority was reduced to a maximum $100,000 per project, or 5% of a project budget. Additionally, approved budget amendments are reviewed by Council each quarter. The City is also exploring external project management services for other impending significant capital projects, especially when internal capacity/expertise is limited or not available.