SD 57 Candidate Questions: Milton Mahoney
1. Why are you running for school trustee? What knowledge and professional qualifications make you a good candidate for SD57 School Board Trustee?
I have a Master’s Degree for a lifetime of experience. I have developed programs, policies and procedures for industry. I have held leadership positions with regards to unions and as well as been in corporate management. In addition, I ran a family corporation, and operated a Conflict Resolution enterprise part time.
I was a Trustee for a short period starting in February 2022. As a Trustee and only having one vote, my success was limited. Being a member of the finance committee, I was able to cut some spending ensuring some very important programs remained a part of the district. I was able to get some new policies tabled for the new board to vote on, rather than having the old board hold a rush vote and pushing these policies through without careful consideration. I was able to make small changes, but for the most part I was hitting my head against the wall. It was far more difficult being a Trustee than I had anticipated. In my very short time as a trustee, I predicted SD57 would be the worst district academically in the province and in fact, the Fraser Institute 2023 evaluation on BC`s School Districts rated SD57 one of the lowest. While on the board I couldn`t convince the board at that time to redirect and correct the path this district was on (I only had one vote) or at least consider the possibility there was something wrong. They chose instead to sanction me because they couldn`t terminate me. I was hampered from speaking the truth on such matters and was not able to report to the public about the many issues the school district was facing.
The Boards of the past 10 years, I believe, lost their focus and were too politically motivated. But let’s not dwell on the past, let’s learn from it. What I learnt was that neither the board nor senior administration had the well-being of all students at the forefront of their goal setting. I also learnt that SD57 has had 7 Superintendents in 7 years, which is quite an accomplishment. This district is the flagship for all the districts in the province, according to the former Minister of Education, when in fact this district is the laughingstock of all the districts in the province. This district is seen as the “what not to do” example for all boards and senior administration. This district has been acting under a ministerial order which was put in place due to the Advisor’s report (instigated by the former minister of education) which was released last year. These recommendations I still believe were compiled using misinformation or information that is no longer relevant to how education is being offered in our district. The Advisors were supposed to work with the last board and give the recommendations to the board for their review, but instead these recommendations were implemented by senior admin without proper consultation with the previous board. The district has a Strategic Plan to enhance Indigenous education and Indigenous graduation rates, as was called for in the Advisor’s recommendations. Instead of raising the bar for all students, this district has lowered the expectation for our Indigenous students, essentially lowering the rate for a pass to less than 40% and every Indigenous student (regardless of passing grade 12 or not) can now walk the stage at a high school graduation ceremony. This district has the Indigenous Education Learning Table, a committee comprised of 2 of the local Indigenous nations to enhance Indigenous learning and increase graduation rates, but also to approve or disapprove other curriculum. There is definitely a place in our educational system and our school district for the local nations to have a voice in the education of their students, the same as any other group of parents would. Indigenous Education needs to play a key part in our schools, as everyone’s history and culture is important and needs to be celebrated. Past administration teams had control over the school board by withholding information or not being truthful, or by ignoring directives. Case in point: the idea of rebranding was defeated by the previous board in the fall, with the realization that money could be better spent in the classroom after the outcry from the public made it known that rebranding needed to take a back seat. If you go to the district’s webpage you will quickly realize that it has changed (the start of rebranding), and the sad part is that at least two trustees knew this rebranding idea was defeated by the former board but still allowed it to move forward with senior admin (even in a reduced capacity).

