Pipeline debate grows

Jul 2, 2026 | 3:49 PM


PRINCE GEORGE – Premier David Eby says a new deal between British Columbia and the federal government could bring up to $20 billion in federal funding for major infrastructure and economic development projects across the province.

The announcement, made Thursday by Prime Minister Mark Carney, includes commitments to mining development, port expansion, the North Coast Power Transition Line, and the replacement of the Massey Tunnel.

The agreement comes as Alberta is expected to announce plans for a new pipeline to the West Coast. Although Eby and Carney did not discuss Alberta’s proposal directly, both confirmed that B.C.’s ban on oil tankers along the northern coast will stay in place.

B.C. Conservatives quickly criticized the decision, saying the tanker ban limits economic opportunities in northern communities and hurts future pipeline development.

Billions Promised For Key Projects

On Thursday, Eby called the memorandum of understanding with Ottawa a major opportunity for British Columbia.

The agreement lists possible federal support for several large projects the province considers priorities. These include mining investments, upgrades to provincial port infrastructure, the North Coast Power Transition Line, and the replacement of the aging Massey Tunnel in Metro Vancouver.

The memorandum also shows Ottawa is willing to support other major infrastructure and resource projects that could help economic growth across B.C.

Although the agreement does not include all project details, Eby said it demonstrates the government’s commitment to investing in projects that are important to the province’s long-term economic future.

Tanker Ban Remains

Even with more talk about a new oil pipeline to the West Coast, Eby and Carney made it clear the northern tanker ban will stay.

Federal law bans large oil tankers from parts of B.C.’s northern coast. Environmental groups and many Indigenous communities have long supported this, but supporters of more energy exports have criticized it.

Carney chose not to comment on Alberta’s expected announcement.

He told reporters they could draw their own conclusions since the tanker ban is staying the same.

This decision raises questions about how future pipeline projects aiming to reach export markets on B.C.’s North Coast could move forward under current federal rules.

Giddens Says Workers Being Overlooked

One of the most outspoken critics of Thursday’s announcement was Conservative MLA and Shadow Minister for Labour Kiel Giddens.

Giddens said the provincial government is putting politics ahead of economic opportunities for workers, especially in northern British Columbia.

“This is a government that is focused more on politics than on the workers of this province,” Giddens said.

“The pipeline in northern B.C. would bring real opportunities for workers. And clearly Eby is still focused on trying to limit that opportunity.”

Giddens said that keeping the tanker ban limits future development and stops export opportunities in the north.

“By keeping the tanker ban in place, we’re actually limiting the potential opportunities,” he said.

“What I think is we need to have a conversation with communities across northern B.C., including First Nations and local governments, to talk about the potential for exporting from northern B.C.”

He said that as current transportation hubs get more crowded, northern ports are becoming more important for future trade.

“The Port of Vancouver is getting congested,” Giddens said. “We need to look to Prince Rupert and other North Coast ports as options.”

Conservatives Question Memorandum

Giddens also questioned how much of the funding announced Thursday is actually new money from Ottawa.

He said several projects in the memorandum were already expected to get federal support.

“The MOU included a number of projects that the federal government was going to support anyway,” he said. “So really this was more about politics.”

Giddens said he is focused on creating new economic opportunities for workers, especially those in northern communities that rely on resource industries.

“What I want to see is opportunities for workers, especially workers in the North,” he said.

“And that’s what this announcement is limiting.”

He added that talks on major energy infrastructure projects should continue, even given the federal government’s stance on the tanker ban.

“I think we need to continue having this conversation about what nation-building projects like pipelines do for our country, and particularly for our northern B.C. economy.”

Conservatives Renew Pipeline Push

The debate grew on Thursday after the B.C. Conservative Party released a statement calling for more pipeline construction.

In the release, party officials pointed to the Trans Mountain Expansion project, saying demand has now reached the pipeline’s maximum capacity of approximately 890,000 barrels of oil per day.

Conservative Shadow Minister for Economic Development Gavin Dew said the project has already delivered significant economic benefits to British Columbia. That’s the proof of concept: $28.9 billion in gross output, and 37,756 person-year jobs in this province,” Dew said.

“Ongoing operations are adding billions more. That’s the proof of concept.”

Dew said the success of Trans Mountain makes a strong case for building more pipelines, and that the province should support additional energy infrastructure rather than oppose it.

Jobs And Economic Growth

Giddens echoed that message in the party’s statement, arguing a new pipeline would create employment opportunities across British Columbia.

“A new pipeline project would provide training, skilled trades jobs, and higher wages for B.C. workers and families,” he said.

“The pathway to prosperity comes through nation-building projects like this, not through political obstruction and endless delays.”

Giddens said ongoing opposition to further pipeline development could have long-term effects on workers seeking jobs in the resource sector. new pipeline, the NDP government is depriving B.C. workers of real opportunities and sowing division within our great country.”

The Conservatives say that expanding Canada’s pipeline network would allow producers to reach new overseas markets and rely less on the United States as the primary buyer of Canadian oil.

Broader Debate Continues

The announcement shows the ongoing tension between economic development, environmental policy, and energy infrastructure in British Columbia.

On one hand, Thursday’s agreement shows strong federal support for infrastructure, mining, and transportation projects that both governments say will help the economy.

On the other hand, keeping the northern tanker ban in place keeps federal restrictions that critics say limit future energy export opportunities.

With Alberta expected to announce details of a new pipeline proposal, debates about energy development, market access, and northern economic growth will likely stay front and center in Western Canada.

For now, British Columbia seems ready to seek billions in federal infrastructure investments while still opposing oil tanker traffic along the North Coast. This approach continues to get both praise and criticism from political leaders across the province.