Dissent can cross a dangerous line, even when Trump is the target
Not even a year and a half since Donald Trump was sworn in as the 45th president of the United States, observers in the U.S. and abroad have begun to worry that the man could change America forever.
But to believe that one man could inflict permanent and lasting damage on a country that fought and won a revolution, suffered through a civil war and helped defeat the evil of Nazi Germany is to have a very low opinion of the resiliency of the republic.
Indeed, one of his first actions as president was to try to implement a sweeping “Muslin ban.” This action was swiftly curtailed and neutralized by the courts as unconstitutional. That should have reassured skittish citizens that one man does not define a country. Even a president is subject to the checks and balances of the constitution.
If there’s lasting danger to the republic, then it doesn’t come from Trump himself. His is but a transient and temporary presence on the political stage. He’s still required to work with Congress and have his actions scrutinized by federal courts. Despite what the man himself may think, he’s not a monarch nor does he wield absolute power.